The Media Trust
Ledbury Calendar

Visit Ledbury
Ice Bytes

 

Ledbury Portal Community Forum

Guests can read the forums. To post a reply or new topic or have access to other forum functionality, please log in above with your site membership details.

Announcement

Welcome to our forum! I've added some new discussion areas and a place for announcements, small ads and even personals so go ahead, jump in and make the place your own. Portal members can log in above with their existing details to get the full features of the forum. To become a Portal member, create an account from the link at the top of the screen. Guests can read the forum anytime...

Add to: Mr. Wong Add to: Mr. Wong Add to: Webnews Add to: Icio Add to: Oneview Add to: Folkd Add to: Yigg Add to: Linkarena Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icio.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Simpy Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Netscape Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Technorati Add to: Newsvine Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Information

#1 2014-08-11 14:15:32

johneager
Moderator

Government by Magazine

Asked recently about his views on the use of neonicotinoids in farming and the potential environmental and agricultural damage these insecticides may cause, Mr Wiggin told the Ledbury Portal that the latest edition of Farmers Weekly had a useful response to the debate.

But should there be a debate when science has conclusive evidence?

The BBC recently reported that: scientists, who have carried out a four-year review of the literature, say the evidence of damage is now "conclusive".

Speaking in Parliament earlier about TB and culling badgers Mr Wiggin took a pro-science view: " "Let me return to the core of the debate, which is science and whether the Government have [sic] paid sufficient attention to the scientific detail and acted accordingly... If we are going to base our decisions on science, we should ensure that the scientists have been heard..."

But what happens if science undermines profit? Can a conflict of interests cause a contradiction of views within the mind of an MP?

This latest political cop out should not be viewed simplistically as Government by Magazine, but as an avoidance to put up a fight against elite corporations and agriculturalists who are profiting from products that are causing this damage. Mr Wiggin's silence - his viewlessness, along with all the other MPs sitting in Parliament, predictably  defends the indefensible.

Mr Wiggin refuses to speak directly to the Ledbury Portal, because by doing so he cannot control the news agenda. But it should be his constituents' right to put important issues into the public domain, and as our only representative in Parliament, Mr Wiggin should be openly responsive and not hide away behind an uncritical or selective establishment-minded media.

 

Forum Tools

Board information

Board statistics
Total number of registered users: 342
Total number of topics: 129
Total number of polls: 0
Total number of posts: 253
Total number of posts this week: 1
User information
Newest registered user: Elim Sports Church Ledbury
Registered users online: 0
Guests online: 36

Powered by Agora 2.5.5 Pantheon
© Copyright 2007 - 2008 Joomla Me!. All rights reserved.